Change in Kashmir’s status deepens region’s divisions
NEW DELHI – India’s move to carve up Kashmir and curtail its autonomous powers has caused division and anger in parts of the far-flung Himalayan region even as followers of Prime Minister Narendra Modi rejoice.
Since Modi’s shock decree last week, protests and celebrations in many towns have widened religious fault lines between communities in the strategic region.
The United Nations Security Council was to discuss Kashmir at a meeting behind closed doors on Friday, after Pakistan formally asked the council to hold an emergency session to address the situation.
At Independence Day celebrations on Thursday, Modi hailed his “path-breaking” move to strip Kashmir of its autonomy, saying, “The old arrangement in Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh encouraged corruption and nepotism, as well as injustice when it came to rights of women, children, (low-caste) Dalits, tribal communities.”
International focus has remained on the Kashmir Valley, where tens of thousands of troops have enforced a lockdown and cut off phone lines and internet connections to head off opposition to the government’s move.
But tensions have spread to other parts of the state, which will be cut in two under the new administrative arrangements.
In remote Ladakh, perched on a steep mountain border with China, the region’s Buddhist minority welcomed Modi’s decision to split the territory from the Muslim-majority valley.
“Ladakh has finally gained freedom,” exclaimed Phunchok Stobdan, a former Indian diplomat and now head of a conference center in Leh, the region’s largest town.
He added that Buddhists had felt excluded from government posts and other opportunities.
Stobdan said the region is underdeveloped and needs a shake-up.
“You can’t keep the area in a frozen state when the entire land mass across on the other side (in China) is getting roads and railways under the Belt and Road project,” he said. “New Delhi had to do this to change the status quo. This is a masterstroke.”
At the other end of Ladakh, many in the Shiite Muslim-majority town of Kargil are in shock. Traders kept their stores closed for several days after the government announcement, amid showdowns between demonstrators and police.
“This was an undemocratic move. It should be rolled back,” Asgar Ali Karbalai, a former regional lawmaker who led some of the protests, said in a telephone interview.
As a so-called union territory, Ladakh will not have its own legislature under the new system.
“It just takes away our voice,” said Karbalai. “The debate around this issue may become communal now as, I feel, most Muslims in Ladakh oppose and the Buddhists support the move.”
But even in Kargil, many are looking for a boost to the rudimentary economy promised by Modi, who said tourism and even the film industry would bolster Ladakh and Kashmir if there was peace.
“It will certainly lead to many more economic opportunities, tourism and growth for everyone,” said Gulzar Hussain Munshi, who runs a museum of artifacts from the ancient Silk Road, which ran through the region.
While Srinagar, Kashmir’s biggest city, with a population of around 1.2 million, remains under curfew, the city of Jammu farther south, with a population of over 500,000, is slowly returning to normal.
Jammu is more than 60 percent Hindu and Sikh, and its citizens have long complained about Muslim-majority Kashmir’s dominance in politics and business. Many local communities’ leaders were seen dancing in the streets of Jammu waving Indian flags after Modi’s announcement.
“After 70 years of discrimination, thankfully we were finally heard,” said Gaurav Gupta, secretary of the Jammu Chamber of Commerce and Industry. “Jammu youth who moved to other Indian cities for education and jobs will be able to return as we finally open up to pan-India investment and growth.”
Government security restrictions have been lifted in many areas around the city. Muslims have staged small protests.